WORD@TheNet Forum

By comparison, Christ called the Father in heaven as "Father" but Roman Catholicism is calling the Father in Vatican City as "Holy Father". The  body of Christ is not being called holy in constrast to the cross, which is being called "holy". When  Christ died, he was resurrected to life by the Father in heaven. But when the cross lost its force against early Christians, who were never afraid to die on the cross, it was resurrected to life by the Holy Father in Vatican City through the Roman Empire. Aside from calling it holy, Roman Catholicism uses "The Name" of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, whenever followers pray, by starting and ending the prayer with a "sign of the cross" and at the same time, uses "The Name" by reciting "In the name of the Father, of the Son, and the Holy Spirit..Amen". This ceremony spiritually put the image of the cross over and above "The name" c

Did God ever establish a depository for His forgiveness? This question has relation to the statement of Pope Francis that "church is depository of God's forgiveness". Obviously, he was referring to Roman Catholicism when he said "church" to the exclusion of other "isms" such as Judaism, Islamism, etc. . As Pope Francis is invoking "The Name" of God in his statement, let us try discussing it if it is in accordance with the scripture. Firstly, is there any declaration in the scripture that God needs a depository for his forgiveness, which is very personal in nature? To illustrate, if A committed a grievous sin against B, can B delegates to C the act of forgiveness for A's sin. Is it proper? More so, when C is doing things which are antagonistic to B by way of usurping the authority of B?

Sexual immorality is closely related to procreation in human beings. This can be gleaned from the procreation statements that accompany the scriptural passages for reproduction in animals and human beings. But first, let us determine their differences based on the scripture. For animals: 15 God said to Noah, 16 “Go out of the boat with your wife, your sons, and their wives. 17 Take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth.” 18 So Noah went out of the boat with his wife, his sons, and their wives. 19 All the animals and birds went out of the boat in groups of their own kind. (Genesis 8:15, TEV). Based on the above verses, is there any prohibition/condition pertaining to the act to procreate for animals and birds? None. For human beings:

Christianity is indeed a confused belief system because while Genesis 9:4 speaks of a prohibited meat to be eaten, it likewise prohibited blood to be eaten, which has no more life in it.  What is this prohibited meat? If deeply analyzed, this prohibited meat has relation to sexual immorality, more specifically, by way of sexually eating human meat as in "oral sex". This has scriptural basis anchored on the following premises: First premise - the reason for prohibiting "eating meat with blood still in it" is because "life is in the blood" and not because "blood is life" or because of "blood" in meat. Second premise -if you take out "life" in blood, you consequently take out the prohibition. In  other words, if you "eat meat with blood still in it" with no more life in  blood in meat then the reason is no longer present, hence, no longer within the prohibition. Third premise -if you take out the blood t

Book of Genesis does not specifically mention the traumatic effects of flood on the family of Noah . However, it will give us t he surrounding circumstances when immorality verse was spoken, which will help in the interpretation. This was spoken to Noah and his sons after the flood, when their fear m ay be noted and the acknowledgement of the power of God was exhibited by Noah's acts of offering sacrifices to God. 13 When Noah was 601 years old, on the first day of the first month, the water was gone. Noah removed the covering of the boat, looked around, and saw that the ground was getting dry. 14 By the twenty-seventh day of the second month the earth was completely dry. 15 God said to Noah, 16 “Go out of the boat with your wife, your sons, and their wives. 17 Take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth.” 18 So Noah went out of the boat with his wife, his sons, and their wives. 19 All the animals and birds wen

Christmas is seven (7) days away. Apparently, only destruction can convince humanity that Christmas is being celebrated to honor a “false Christ”; that December 25 is not the Christ’s birthday; that Christmas is an exercise in futility; that the alleged “holy” mass celebrated by Roman Catholic Alleged Church on the day of Christmas is a traditional religious deception; and, that “The Name” was and presently used in vain to deceive the  world through  Christmas . Everybody maybe requiring proof that Christmas is false by making that day no longer "merry" because of catastrophe But fortunately, disasters may be able to explain more clearly the scriptural truths, which are being destroyed by Roman Catholicism, opportunism, secularism which resulted to “same-sex marriage” and reproductive health law, and atheism.  In essence, it will be a counter-destruction of the destroyer of truths. Theoretically, on Christmas day, another evidence of religious deception wil

In the previous article entitled origin of sexual immorality , a question was raised, which is substantially-whether or not the word "life" stated in Genesis 9:4 refers only to "human"  to the exclusion of "animal" life. For  reference, the verse is restated herein, to wit; 4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it. I forbid this because the life is in the blood.( Genesis 9:4, TEV ) Life is presently understood to include animal life. This understanding is also reinforced by science today. Is it so in Genesis 9:4? But first, what is the materiality of the meaning of life in  second sentence in the interpretation of the verse. It is material to the interpretation because, logically, if only human life is being referred in the statement, then, it would follow that the meat and blood mentioned in the first sentence would likewise  belong to human, not to animal.  Since verse 4 does not specifically mention what kind m

This is an introductory article. Succeeding articles will deal on immorality or lust known today as " oral sex ", " same-sex marriage ", Filipino dialect's "kumakain ng hilaw na karne " or " eating uncooked meat ", sodomy and same-sex relations in reproductive health law . Specifically, they will touch on how they were induced by Vatican City . The articles will also delve on how they will eventually lead humanities to worldwide catastrophe, anchored on Habakkuk 2 doom verses.The participation of United States in immorality through "same-sex marriage" shall be discussed, including the reproductive health law in the Philippines and its repercussions.   To forewarn, the author will be very thankful if nothing significant will happen this coming April 2014 . He has his basis but will be affirmed only at that time. When the author says April 2014, he is referring to a month and year, not hours or days. The basis of sexua

President Aquino III signed into law the  Philippine " oral sex" law or  Reproductive Health Law but after doing it he says: "You know at the end of the day , the only criteria I have is: Did I do right? And sometimes the right decision may be unpopular. And sometimes, it seems that conversely the wrong decision is immensely popular".   (Report by Delon Porcalla.(The Philippine Star News, December 10, 2013) President Aquino had certified urgent the reproductive health bill last December 14, 2012. Apparently, he failed to consider the prior warning by way of Typhoon Pablo which was merely considered as part of nature. The typhoon, a Category 5 super typhoon with winds of 175 mph (280 km/h), killed more than 1,020, with 844 people missing in Mindanao, reported on December 16, 2012. Despite the warning, pro-RH Filipinos still insisted on their alleged reproductive health rights, which are delusional. Two (2) days after the approval of the bill by

Pope Francis totally lacks any legal personality to attack the "trickle-down " theories based on his alleged justifiable and moral grounds. Nor has the rights to utter words against "money" , any person or anything in heaven, on earth and underneath the sea.  Above propositions are logical unless he does first the following;  He should first attack the "holy" cross, "holy" rosary, rosary beads and strings, and every Roman Catholic idols, e.g images and statues, which are being promoted by Roman Catholic Alleged Church. He should also first return the title of the "Holy Father" to the real owner, including all the donations, monetary or proprietary, and all the "moneys" that the Roman Catholic alleged church had benefited in selling deceptive images, statues and candles, etc and all the fees paid for baptisms, masses, weddings, burials, etc, to all deceived followers. The Pope should likewise civilly compensate

The scenario is: "estoppel doctrine versus "false churches" doctrines". What is a doctrine of estoppel? And how will it helps prove the criminal liabilities of "false churches" in case of calamities? But before proceeding, let us first review the man's rules on evidence and how the "words" that are stated in "The Word", which others call as "The Holy Bible", are to be treated as evidence. Taking for example the verses from 2 Kings , stating as follows: 23Everything else that Jehoram did is recorded in the History of the Kings of Judah. 24Jehoram died and was buried in the royal tombs in David's City , and his son Ahaziah succeeded him as king.(2 Kings 8:23-24, TEV). Given the above set of of allegations, is it possible to establish the truth on the same despite the absence of physical evidence of the Kingdom of Judah or the history book being referred in the verses? How about the truth of burial of Jehora

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

To eradicate disasters, a simple formula is available to Filipinos-simply eradicate Roman Catholicism and other causes of Creator's anger .  Once the Filipinos had eradicated the root causes of anger, what follows is the protection. On the other hand, if people continue to offend the Creator, destruction is expected and may even come at the instance of the Creator Himself. Can anybody object if the Creator destroys His creation ? One may object but the only thing he can do is only "objecting" and nothing more. That's why, the Creator is called "Almighty". He can do everything but human beings can do nothing, without Him. If it happened that you were created the same way as the statues and images that were created by human hands, can you move, sit, stand, talk, think, speak, write, and feel? Can you love and procreate? Can you go to the night clubs, parties and go with your friends? Is it not a fact that in every aspect of your life, the differ

Several questions are needed to know if you are an enemy or a friend.   I Filipinos, how do you rate yourselves? Are you friends or enemies of God? Considering the Bohol-Cebu earthquake and the Yolanda incidents, are you still confident that God is your friend?

Pope Francis does not like "money" to be idolized. On deeper analysis however, it turns out that he was referring to "greed" in money being constitutive of idolatry. But, is the use of word "idolatry" appropriate for "greed'? Before we discuss this questionable use of word "greed" in "idolatry", let us first quote the report in www.rawstory.com. "Speaking at daily Mass on Monday, Pope Francis condemned the worship of money." "Though money itself was not inherently evil, Francis said the attachment to money lead to destruction of families, friends, and the self". “It leads you to idolatry, it destroys your relationship with others,” he said, according to Radio Vatican. “It’s not money, but the attitude, what we call greed. Then too this greed makes you sick, because it makes you think of everything in terms of money. It destroys you, it makes you sick.”