Estoppel on false doctrines
The scenario is: "estoppel doctrine versus "false churches" doctrines". What is a doctrine of estoppel? And how will it helps prove the criminal liabilities of "false churches" in case of calamities? But before proceeding, let us first review the man's rules on evidence and how the "words" that are stated in "The Word", which others call as "The Holy Bible", are to be treated as evidence. Taking for example the verses from 2 Kings , stating as follows: 23Everything else that Jehoram did is recorded in the History of the Kings of Judah. 24Jehoram died and was buried in the royal tombs in David's City , and his son Ahaziah succeeded him as king.(2 Kings 8:23-24, TEV). Given the above set of of allegations, is it possible to establish the truth on the same despite the absence of physical evidence of the Kingdom of Judah or the history book being referred in the verses? How about the truth of burial of Jehora...